Category Archives: Review

Leica Noctilux-M 50 mm f0.95 ASPH Review

Comparison of current Leica 50mm lenses. Cheapest and smallest to the most expensive and fastest. L-R: 50 mm f/2.5 Summarit-M, 50 mm f/2 Summicron-M, 50 mm f/1.4 Summilux-M and 50 mm f/0.95 Noctilux-M, in front of a Leica M9 (Steel Grey). April 01, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

No other manufacturer offers as many 50mm lenses as Leica does for its M range. In the current line-up are four; the f2.5 Summarit, f2 Summicron, f1.4 Summilux and the f0.95 Noctilux. Along with 35mm, 50mm is the classic rangefinder focal length, so it comes as no surprise to find this many 50mm lenses available. Apart from purely the light gathering properties of them, each adds a unique signature to the image it creates; non more so than Leica’s Noctilux.

Comparison of current Leica 50mm lenses. Cheapest and smallest to the most expensive and fastest. L-R: 50 mm f/2.5 Summarit-M, 50 mm f/2 Summicron-M, 50 mm f/1.4 Summilux-M, 50 mm f/0.95 Noctilux-M and for size comparison a Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens. April 01, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

The Noctilux, meaning “Light of the night”, started in 1966 with an f1.2 version designed by Helmut Marx. A new design by Dr Walter Mandler in 1976 pushed the aperture to an astonishing f1.0 and along with redesigns of the lens body resulting in four versions, the f1.0 Noctilux continued until it was replaced in 2008 by the current f0.95 Aspherical Noctilux designed by Peter Karbe.

Comparison of current Leica 50mm lenses. The Leica 50 mm f/0.95 Noctilux-M and for size comparison a Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens. April 01, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

According to Stefan Daniel, Leica’s Director for Product Management, “the Noctilux 0.95/50 is one of the most demanding lenses currently in production and we can only assign production and assembly to the most experienced and skilled people in the whole company”. It is also the most expensive lens in the M and S range, costing £7348.00. It may therefor come as a bit of a surprise when one learns that it’s also one of the most in demand lenses with the longest waiting list (an honour it shares with the 35mm f1.4 Summilux-ASPH). According to the Leica Store Mayfair, one can expect up to a 12 month wait from the point of order.

English countryside, around Royston, Hertfordshire. June 13,2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

Although the lens itself takes 16 hours to assemble by hand, it’s the raw materials and optics, some of which have a rumoured 12 month period to cool from being cast, which add to the length of time required. There is some very exotic glass used in this lens.

Shot wide open at f0.95, using a B+W ND filter to lower the exposure and allow shooting in this way during daylight. English countryside, around Royston, Hertfordshire. June 13,2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

For the seeker of a Noctilux, there is the opportunity to look for one of the older f1.0 versions, which depending on model and condition seem to range in the £3-5000.00 on the used market, saving money and time. Although the f1.0 versions are fast and will allow similar use in low light, all but the current f0.95 version have a smooth. soft and “glowy” signature look when shot wide open. It’s a beautiful look that works extremely well for certain types of portrait and still life, but not suitable for everything. This limits it’s use as an every day lens and makes it a special use lens, meaning one needs a standard 50mm as well. The same is definitely not true of the current f0.95 ASPH Noctilux which not only allows photography in even lower light, but does so with such pin sharp precision that it makes the lens suitable for everything. It is in fact a superb standard lens.

Portrait of Armenian singer Charles Aznavour in his suite at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in New York, NY, USA, ahead of an event by the Fund For Armenian Relief (FAR); 20 Years Of Armenian Independence Honoring Mr Aznavour. May 20, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

In the days of shooting film, the Noctilux opened up possibilities with shooting in low light that would have been impossible, even with an f1.4 lens. However, in the days of digital, this isn’t as big a problem as one can, up to a limit, just push up the ISO. There is more to choosing a Noctilux though and I would suggest that more people choose it now days for it’s signature look than they do purely for it’s speed in low light photography.

New York Fire Department (NYFD) answer a call on the streets of New York. New York, NY. May 19, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

Apart from it’s cost, another aspect which sets it apart from the other Leica M 50mm lenses is it’s size. The Leica shooter is generally used to tiny lenses. However, to any SLR shooter, the f0.95 can actually seem small compared to the f2.8 zooms and compares favourably in size to Canon’s 50mm f1.2L lens; currently the fastest 50mm lens available for the SLR market.

In Use

Along with my M9, 21mm, 35mm and 90mm M lenses, I took the Noctilux on a four day assignment to Glasgow. The Noctilux turned out to be by far my favourite lens to work with and apart from three occasions, I came to realise that I had shot the entire assignment on it and I must say that the results looked rather special.

British street party on Enfield Road and the Lord Nelson pub, Brentford, Middlesex on the occasion of the Royal Wedding of Prince William to Catherine Middleton at Westminster Abbey on April 29, 2011 in London, England. Sisters in wedding dresses watch the wedding on a TV inside the pub. Friday, April 29, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

It takes a short while to get used to it’s size on an M camera. It’s so well made though with such a beautifully buttery focus movement that it just comes to hand very quickly indeed. One thing that constantly surprised me early on was just how little light I needed to make pictures. I was constantly taking down the ASA and in other situations where I thought I needed a flash, I kept realising that the available light was more than enough.

British street party on Enfield Road and the Lord Nelson pub, Brentford, Middlesex on the occasion of the Royal Wedding of Prince William to Catherine Middleton at Westminster Abbey on April 29, 2011 in London, England. A young girl in a wedding dress watches the wedding on a TV inside the pub. Friday, April 29, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

I have worked extensively with the 50mm Summicron and 50mm Elmarit-M f2.8. Both amazing lenses with great image rendition. However, nothing I have shot with, including Leica’s discontinued 75mm Summilux f1.4 or Canon’s 85mm f1.2L II, produce images like the Noctilux. The Noctilux’s images just pop. Your point of focus is pin sharp and rendered perfectly. Shot wide open the background blur is phenomenal and absolutely unique. Even Zeiss, which is known for its background rendition, can come close to how this lens renders.

A passer by reads the plaque by The Force of Nature II, sculpture by Lorenzo Quinn, Berkeley Square, London. March 03, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

It’s not all roses though. This lens is challenging to work with at f0.95. The depth of field is practically non-existent and one has to be absolutely spot on with focus. It’s therefor a good idea to send your Leica rangefinder back to Solms with your Noctilux to have them calibrated to match perfectly. Leica products are very accurately calibrated to within tiny tolerance margins; however, shooting at f0.95, all it takes is for the camera to be plus in the tolerance range and for the lens to be minus in the tolerance range and the image is slightly out of focus. This is an absolute must as otherwise one would just give up on the lens, judging it too challenging to work with. A big mistake, as the magic of the lens will then remain undiscovered.

Also, when at f0.95, strongly backlit subjects do sometimes suffer from purple fringing and in these situations it’s best to stop down a little.

Conclusions

The Leica rangefinder has always been a favourite with photographers who like to work with available light. The lack of a reflex mirror means that it’s much easier to hand hold at slower shutter speeds. With this ethos in mind and the fact that the f0.95 is by far the fastest lens currently available on the market for any full frame camera, it makes absolute sense to have it’s abilities. It creates beautiful images with a amazingly soft and fluid bokeh (out of focus detail rendition) that its makes your subject pop; it gives more dimension and depth to every picture. I’ve even heard people commenting on the pictures it creates as being 3D.

Shots around the book sellers on London's Southbank. July 22, 2011. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

Is it worth the asking price? Perhaps not for some photographers, as you could buy an M9 and a 50mm f1.4 Summilux-M ASPH for a fraction more. However, in a world where everyone shoots with the same equipment, with a sea of 24-70s, firstly the Leica M9 and any Leica lens will set your work apart. The Noctilux then takes this much further and makes it unique. It’s good to be an individual.

To view more images, visit my Leica Noctilux set on Flickr. This article was first published in the BJP in June 2011.

Why The Leica M9?

I’ve been shooting with Leica M cameras (M3, M4-2, M4p and M6) since 1989. They suit exactly what I want from my photography. When I first reviewed the Leica M9, I just knew I had to get one; it took me back to my film shooting days and reminded me of how I used to work. You can read my first review on the Leica M9 in an earlier post.

The brilliant Kai over at DigitalRev has made this great short film which explains and shows rather nicely just what is so special about the Leica M-System.

 

Battle of the Bokeh

Leica 50mm f0.95 Noctilux Vs Canon 50mm f1.2L

An interesting look at how the currently in production fastest lenses compare in look, specifically the way they render out of focus (or bokeh) areas. Still no idea what the correct way to pronounce this word is, but it’s an interesting little video by the Digital Rev folks.

Video Review – Leica Noctilux 50mm f0.95

Here’s a video review from Digital Rev on my favourite ever lens; the Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH.

You can see a selection of shots with this lens on my Flickr.

Sekonic C-500 Prodigi Colour Meter

Getting Colour Right

Colour; it can be the cause of endless head aches. With digital photography, we’re in many ways quite lucky as we can set custom white balances and even dial in degrees of Kelvin (which is unit for the measurement of temperature and in our case, colour temperature).

However, most photographers are quite lazy in this and will shoot in auto white balance and hope to correct things later in post processing. This is not such a bad thing if one shoots RAW but I’ve seen many colleagues shoot jpeg and then try and correct the most horrendous colour casts and end up ruining perfectly good images as a result. Even for us who do shoot RAW, we’re still reliant on finding a neutral grey to click our white balance tool on and tweak the slider until it looks right. To do this, we’re also relying on our monitors and laptop displays to be accurately calibrated.

In the world of video it gets much more complicated and many times more time consuming. To make things worse, any extreme colour corrections can lead to a degradation in quality as unless you’re shooting with a RED One, you’re not shooting RAW.

The Sekonic C-500 Prodigi Colour Meter. Photo: Edmond Terakopian

For anyone who hasn’t tried it, setting a custom white balance involves photographing a white (or grey) card and choosing that image as a custom setting. This works extremely well and allows for exact colours, even in pretty extreme lighting conditions. The only downside to this is having to stop and either use a white balance tool (EzyBalance) such as those made by Lastolite or try and find a notepad with white paper that is big enough to photograph. An extra step is then needed to set the white balance to custom and finally to choose this image as the reference for the custom white balance. It is rather longwinded.

If shooting on a tripod with creative and spot lighting, it can also be an extra head ache as the camera has to be taken off the tripod, brought to where the light is falling on the subject, white card photographed, then set and finally put back on the tripod and set up again for the shot. Even adjusting power settings or diffusion on lights can change the colour temperature.

This is where a colourmeter comes in to save the day. It involves the photographer holding the light receptor in the light being photographed, with it pointing back towards the camera. A measuring button is then pressed and it gives an exact Kelvin reading of the colour temperature. All you then have to do is to set this on the camera and shoot away. In a photographic situation I also sometimes just make a note of the temperature in different areas I’m working and then input these onto the RAW files when processing them on Aperture 3. Both systems work equally well. Naturally for video work though, one inputs the Kelvin reading into the camera before doing a shot.

Many years ago I tried using a Minolta colourmeter (designed in the days of film) with limited success; it certainly improved upon the auto setting but I still needed to tweak my shots. Sekonic, with the C-500 and C-500R (for pocket wizard connectivity) has brought out the world’s first digital and film colour meter. The spectral sensitivities of film and a digital sensor are different and by catering for both (you can change this in the mode setting) it works perfectly with digital cameras. For film shooters it can also give index readings for filters.

As is my way with tests, I took the Sekonic C-500 out with me on assignments. I used the meter with both a Canon 5D MkII (which uses a CMOS sensor) and a Leica M9 (which uses a CCD) and the results were great. On one event in the Army and Navy Club I photographed in a variety of artificial lighting conditions and the results were pretty much spot on. The meter can be tweaked to work with particular cameras even more accurately.

I also decided to do a set of video tests and using an X-Rite ColorChecker as a test subject, I shot film clips using the Canon 5D MkII in various lighting conditions from bright sunlight to extreme shade and also artificial light. The results again impressed.

All was not perfect though; although the meter has the ability to measure from 2300 to 20,000 Kelvin, it doesn’t seem to work in dim lighting and constantly gave an “Under” message. This happened even if the meter was brought right up to the light.

On the whole though, I have to say that I’m impressed with the meter and in all but the most extreme low light, it worked well. I think that any photographer who works in colour would do well to contemplate getting one of these and it’s an absolute no-brainer for anyone involved in video.

Fuji X100

Test Images From The Fujifilm X100 At High ASA

I had the opportunity to have a quick play with the new Fuji X100 over dinner and took a series of images inside a dimly lit restaurant and it’s surroundings during Focus on Imaging in Birmingham. My full and proper review will follow once I get a review sample, but wanted to share a few images. These images can be found on my Flickr Page.