Are Things Easier Now?

On May 27th I went to an event at the National Theatre called “Magnum 68” where some work from 1968 was shown, compared to some more modern work and a short Q&A followed.

One of the modern day images shown was John Moore’s amazing shot from the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. The commentator claimed that compared to the earlier photographers like Robert Capa, Moore had it easy. He carried on saying that because modern cameras have automatic exposure, motor drives and AF, things are much easier and as a result perhaps don’t deserve the praise that the “classics” do.

Now, don’t get me wrong; I have the utmost respect for work done by Capa. However saying that we now have it easy is ridiculous. The fact that modern day cameras have all this stuff doesn’t mean that the photographer is protected from danger; neither does it mean that the camera will have any soul, or be in the right place at the right time. Neither does it guarantee the decisive moment will be captured.

Upon further thought, the Leicas used by Capa were revolutionary. I’m sure that photographers using 120 roll film and Rolleiflexes called the Leica 35mm brigade cheats. These small cameras with better and quicker handling, had 36 shots compared to 12, quick and accurate focus and the ability to fire off at least a frame a second. Does this mean that photographers like Capa and Cartier-Bresson don’t deserve the respect their work has? Were they cheating?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.